State laws and glassware

Posted on September 11th, 2007 in Random Thoughts, Rants by Justin

Thanks Tennessee. Way to ruin an otherwise great beer tasting event.

Mollie and I attended a tasting tonight, hosted by a distributor here in Nashville, that was spotlighting Appalachian Beer Company. We arrived early at the beer store hosting the tasting, and decided to grab a beer while we waited. We grabbed a couple beers (mine was the Harviestoun Brewery Old Engine Oil and hers the Chocolate Stout by Fort Collins Brewery), paid for them, and proceeded to the lounge to grab a seat and enjoy our apertif before the tasting. We walked up and stopped at the spot where we normally grab a glass and pour the beer.

No glasses. Anywhere.

A quick inquiry to one of the employees revealed the truth: the health department had come by earlier and demanded they stop serving beer in glasses until they purchase a separate license. No pouring a beer from a bottle to a glass. Customer can’t pour their own; customer can’t bring their own serving vessel. Nothing. No glassware. Period. (In fact, this goes for not just glassware, but plastic, etc… ANY container whatsoever.)

Dismayed, I pressed further for an explanation. Evidently, according to the state law, beer cannot be transferred from one vessel (a bottle) to another (a glass) without proper licensing. Sure, you can serve it to patrons in a bottle, but god forbid you put it in a glass.

Say it with me….”What?!”

Yeah. Ridiculous. As I continued through the tasting, drinking beer from a bottle like a college frat kid, the gravity of the situation stewed on me. What kind of logic dictates this type of law?

I’ll answer that…none.

This, to me, is about nothing but money. Money to fill the state coffers by taxing alcohol in a backhanded and unfounded manner. Enter the neo-prohibitionists.

I’ll blog more about the tasting later, but I don’t feel like I can give an accurate review of the beer, as I was relegated to drinking out of a 1″ glass hole. I don’t blame the shop necessarily, as they are working hard to get the proper permits in place so that they will have glassware for their next tasting (a Sam Adams tasting in two weeks). I applaud them for the quick action to correct this problem.

What really irks me is the gall of the state lawmakers to craft laws that have absolutely zero basis in logic, but then, I suppose that’s the mantra of most government workings.

I realize this is a pretty scattered rant, but it’s getting late and I haven’t had much time to put this together in my head in a nice organized manner. Suffice to say, it bothered me enough that I wanted to write something tonight in order to assure I sleep a bit better.

Here’s what I want from you, the reader of this blog (all 2 of you): Tell me, under what line of logic can you base a law that requires a special permit in order to transfer beer from a bottle to a glass? Are we honestly that caught up in legislative red tape that our beer stores can’t even serve a beer correctly? This is where politics starts to really affect beer, and we’ve got to make sure it doesn’t get any more ridiculous than this.

So, tell me… how does this law make sense? I’m eager to read the responses.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Pricey beer still sitting on the shelf

Posted on September 11th, 2007 in Beer News by Justin

Turns out things are too good to be true.  Such is the case with Dan Woodul, the 25 year old who auctioned off a bottle of beer on eBay for over a half a million dollars.

Last month, Woodul listed the bottle, an 1852 vintage of Allsopp’s Artic Ale, on eBay and let the requests start piling in.  He had originally bought the bottle on eBay for only $304 (only $304?!).  Upon listing it on eBay, he quick accrued what would have amounted to a world record for the most expensive bottle of beer with the auction ending at $503,300.

However, it turns out the bid wasn’t legit.

Woodul says the bidder called the night that the auction ended to let him know that it was a joke bid and wouldn’t cough up the sum of money.  He says he has no hard feelings toward the bidder, and has now placed the bottle into a safety deposit box with no plans to sell it or re-list it on eBay. 

Read the full story

What would you do with a 155 year old bottle of beer?

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Reminder - Live at Boscos tonight!

Posted on September 10th, 2007 in Our Podcast - Davis On Draft by Justin

Hey all  -

Just a quick reminder:  We’ll be podcasting live at Boscos in Nashville, TN tonight around 6:00 p.m. CST.  Come out and hang out with us, or listen online to the live stream of the show!  To connect to the stream, visit www.davisondraft.com.  The stream should be available around 5:30 p.m. CST.

On the live stream, you’ll be able to chat with us in real time if you register at the streaming website (ustream.tv; registration is free!).  Register early and come with questions!

Looking forward to seeing everyone tonight.

Justin and Mollie Davis
Davis on Draft

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Session #7: The Brew Zoo

Posted on September 7th, 2007 in The Session by Justin

The SessionAnimals everywhere. In an effort to save the beer animal kingdom from extinction, beer bloggers across the globe are banding together to rescue these endangered creatures. As we file them onto our “beer ark”, two-by-two, we revel in their incredible beauty, smell and taste (no animals have been cooked during the production of this blog post). I chose to go with some smaller animals, including one odd animal that is an anomaly. Interested? Read on….

Moorhouse’s Black Cat: Leading the feline charge is a dark brown/black cat that pours clear. A nice medium brown head adorns this creature. With a nose of sweet molasses, raisin and light chocolate, this cat smells like a winner. We take a taste, and we are greeted by a medium/thin body (has this cat eaten in awhile?) with hints of light roasted coffee and chocolate. Somewhere from behind, molasses perks its head, but softly. Raisins sit on the front of the tongue, while a roastiness that is redolent of the char on grill grates brings up the finish. With hops out of the way, the finish is quick. You can visit this cat over and over in a single evening. Very sessionable.

Otter Head: A fairly blase’ example, this watery creature has a taste profile to match. Despite the pretty medium copper/red color and the sweet aroma of caramel, meat and vanilla, the taste of the beer doesn’t stack up to it’s body. Sweet caramel and raw dough make up the palate, with a bready finish. Simple through the mouth…perhaps too simple considering the body of the beer. Worth a shot to experience this animal once…probably not again.

Daleside Brewery Monkey Wrench: Ok, ok. I realize that a monkey wrench isn’t an animal. BUT, it had a monkey on the label. Take my word, and read on. This primate has a thin head atop a ruby clear body, a nice contrast to the beige carpet and dark table it sits against. Taking a whiff of the nose reveals a subtle earthy character (this seems appropriate, no?) with caramel, sweet malt and dark fruit. Medium carbonation and body meets the mouth, as the sweet caramel flavors balance out the light wash of English hops across the back. A bit of light smoke in the background supports the dark fruit and light bread, moving into a medium length dry finish that clears nicely, leaving you ready for another sip. According to ratebeer.com and beeradvocate.com, this is an Old Ale. I disagree. This seems much more like an ESB to me. Perhaps my palate isn’t sophisticated enough, but the level of caramel seems to suggest otherwise. That said, this one is certain to be monkeyed around with…a great beer.

Duck Rabbit Imperial Stout: Perhaps the oddest creature on the boat. Water meets land in this black, opaque animal that shows a pillowy and persistent dark tan head. Get close enough to this animal and you’ll find a sweet aroma that is spiked with dark fruit, roasted grain, alcohol, prunes, raisins and sweet milk chocolate. Certainly, this is a complex beast. Have a taste will you? You’ll find roasted dry coffee beans with a rich bitterness across the back of the mouth. A distinctly astringent note hints at Black Patent malts with alcohol sitting in the center of the mouth. As you swallow, notice the long roasted finish of coffee beans, chocolate and espresso.

These animals certainly make up a diverse addition to the ark of animals we have sailing across the ocean of craft beer. Hopefully, you’ll be able to find one of these exotic creatures and take your own look!

Make sure to check out all the other creatures in the Brew Zoo!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Loading the animals into the zoo…later tonight

Posted on September 7th, 2007 in Random Thoughts by Justin

Today is the first Friday of September, and thus, it’s beer blogging Friday, otherwise known as “The Session”.  This month, the theme is “The Brew Zoo”, with beer bloggers all writing about beers that have animals on the label or in the name.  I’ve got some cats, dogs, otters and monkeys coming later tonight….check back later for the full show!

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Craft beer snobbery

Posted on September 5th, 2007 in Random Thoughts by Justin

Sorry for the slow week -  I’ve been out of town and quite busy otherwise, including writing tasting notes for the upcoming beer blogging Friday event - The Session.

That said, I did want to at least post briefly and point out a great blog post by Lew Bryson this week on beer snobbery and elitism, with respect to Fat Tire.  Now, let me preface this by saying I’ve not had Fat Tire yet.  We can’t get it here in Nashville, and we haven’t traveled far enough West yet to grab some and give it a shot.  Want to mail us a bottle? :)

Anyway, although I’ve never had it, I’m fully aware of the controversy and conversation surrounding this beer.  Two camps seem to set up - a true “love it or hate it” scenario.  Unfortunately, however, it seems as if the “hate it” camp hate it for the wrong reason.  Not because they don’t like the beer - because they think they shouldn’t like the beer.  Uh oh.  Bad move for craft beer drinkers.  We don’t want to become elitist here. 

I’ll admit, there are times I’ve made passing comments about a few beers because of the wrong reasons.  Redhook, in particular.  Because of its association with AB, I’ve been skeptical about the quality of the beer.  Now…I want to make this crystal clear:  Even though I’ve had hesitation regarding the quality of Red Hook, I’ve not passed judgement until I’ve tasted it, and even then, my basis for critique is based off of the taste, nothing else.  I don’t particularly enjoy their beers as much as other craft beer (and yes, I do consider it them a craft brewery), but that doesn’t preclude me from making my own decisions based on taste and letting other folks make their own decisions.  In short, my not liking the beer doesn’t come from the fact that they are associated with AB, but rather starts with the taste, and then I look to other factors such as ownership for an explanation…not the other way around.  That’s very important.  I certainly don’t dismiss it as not being a craft beer, and I certainly don’t look down upon people who enjoy it.

Read Lew’s post.  It’s very interesting, and I think, spot on.  Sam Adams and Sierra Nevada are under the same sort of pressure from the beer geekerie lately, and that’s sad, considering that they are both pioneers in this field.  Support your craft brewers and make decisions based on what they should be made on - taste.

.

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Micheal Jackson has died

Posted on August 30th, 2007 in Beer News by Justin

You’re reading that correctly. Micheal Jackson, the beer critic/writer/educator, has died. He died yesterday morning, August 30, at his home in London.

This is a huge blow for the beer community worldwide. Not just a few weeks after the death of Sierra Nevada VP Steve Harrison, Micheal Jackson joins him in seeking out a better pub in a better place. God speed.

I hadn’t had the chance to meet Micheal yet. I was hoping that I would be able to this year at GABF, and at least shake his hand. As I am a relative newbie in the craft beer scene (just a coupleish years), I haven’t had the opportunity to read all his work. That said, I am more than familiar with it. Michael Jackson contributed so much to the worldwide beer scene, became beer’s first real celebrity, and wrote some of the definitive work regarding beer and beer styles.

Somehow, Micheal was constantly popping up in public view. I remember Mollie and I stumbling across a clip from him on Conan O’Brien. Awesome. Conan didn’t give Micheal much in the way of serious conversation (or respect for beer, for that matter), but it was simply awesome to think that someone whose life’s work was educating about beer was on such a huge show. To me, it was a sign of the times in terms of craft beer’s advancement in the world. It was a huge moment of optimism.

He will be sorely missed.

Micheal was suffering from Parkinson’s disease. I only wonder what his last beer was - I hope it was something truly spectacular. RIP Micheal.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Where should craft beer lovers draw the line?

Posted on August 27th, 2007 in Random Thoughts by Justin

A few recent postings and articles have me thinking.  As craft beer lovers, we can sometimes easily get labeled “snobby” or “holier than thou” regarding our opinions about craft beer.  For me, I try to avoid falling into the uber-snob camp, taking the approach that each person has different tastes, and what I consider a great beer may be terrible to someone else.  Seems logical. 

Anyway, a few things have come up recently that have danced on the fringe of this, so I figured it was time to talk a bit about it.

The first one was a flurry of articles and blog posts last week about Blue Moon and its place in the craft beer world.  The initial blog post by Stan Hieronymus at his blog created some interesting discussion around a central theme:  should Blue Moon have a place at the craft beer table, being considered a quality craft beer among its brethren?

It’s an interesting debate.  As a craft beer enthusiast, it’s very easy (perhaps too easy) to quickly dismiss Blue Moon as a junk beer due the fact that it’s made by Coors.  Fair enough, and considering the reputation of other “craft brands” produced by the mainstream beer companies, it’s easily understood why Blue Moon gets the rap that it does.  However….as true craft beervangelists, are we perhaps missing the point?

Blue moon gets people into drinking better craft beer.  Shouldn’t that be the standard we’re apply to these brands?

Thousands of people are getting into discovering niche branded beers through these “craft” labels that the macro guys are putting out.  Even if those of us deeply entrenched in the craft beer circle don’t consider it a good beer….perhaps we should respect what it is doing for craft beer as a whole.

Yes, it’s easy to take the other side.  “Sure Justin, we get that, but if people drink Blue Moon and don’t like it, won’t it ruin the notion of craft beer to them in general?”  Yeah, maybe, but those folks aren’t coming over to our side regardless.  Think about it.  Someone coming from a macro-beer background who doesn’t like Blue Moon will probably have an aversion to most other craft brands out there.  Those folks don’t care about taste, period.  If anything, their complaint won’t be that it lacks body or development, or that it lacks complexity…it’ll be that it has too much flavor.

So…as difficult as it may be for some, perhaps we in the craft beer world should be looking at the real issues surrounding the craft brands put out by the big guys.  Yes, many of them aren’t good.  Yes, many of them can’t really be considered craft beer.  But, if those brands (however bad they may or may not be) are transitioning folks to explore more craft brands…well…good for them.

Homebrewing

I don’t talk much about homebrewing on this blog, or the podcast for that matter, but a series of posts on a discussion forum got me thinking.  To the same end that craft beer drinkers should consider Blue Moon as good for the craft beer industry, so should homebrewers give the same thought to beginner homebrewing systems.

As an all-grain brewer for a few years, I’ve sunk a good deal of money into gadgets, kettles, cooling systems, etc… for my hobby.  I do it because I like how much control I have over my beer - and I’m a nerd.

In the brewing community, there is sometimes a real animosity against basic brewing systems, particularly one called “Mr. Beer”.  Yeah, Mr. Beer is a oversimplified solution to homebrewing, and may not produce the best beer in the world (or does it?), but again…we’re missing the point.

It exposes more people to homebrewing and sparks the seed of curiousity that helps expand the hobby as a whole. 

Many homebrewers start out with very basic systems in order to get a slow feel for what it takes to brew your own beer.  I think it’s a great thing that there are homebrewing systems available that allow people such a low barrier to entry into the hobby.  For many people, those basic systems quickly get overhauled into sophisticated, garage-hungry, multi-tier, all grain facilities.   If someone wants to start with Mr. Beer….we shouldn’t look down on that decision, rather, we should be excited that another person will be exposed to the hobby of homebrewing. 

The same goes for Blue Moon and drinking craft beer. 

So…I realize that this rant is probably random and loose, but that’s ok.  If it gets one more person thinking about it, then my job is done :)

Let’s put down the snobbery and hail anything that serves as a gate for people into the world of craft beer and homebrewing.  Once they’ve got a foot in the door, we can win them over with the huge offerings inside.

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Live at Bosco’s - Sept 10

Posted on August 27th, 2007 in Our Podcast - Davis On Draft by Justin

For those of you who listen to the podcast and are in the Nashville area, we’ll be doing a live podcast from Bosco’s in downtown Nashville on September 10th.  We’ll get started with the show somewhere between 5:00 and 5:30, and it should last about an hour.  Be sure to come out, have a pint and listen in as we talk about Bosco’s, their beer, and craft beer in general. 

See you out there!  

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Should we give beer another name?

Posted on August 21st, 2007 in Random Thoughts by Justin

Mollie and I were talking about this last night, as we have a few other times in the past: does beer need a new name?

Being a beer lover - strike that, a craft beer lover - can be incredibly frustrating. Attempting to change the public perception of what beer is proves to be an uphill battle much of the time. The accepted definition of beer as a light, watery, alcohol delivery system in a can is so entrenched in our society that it’s going to take a lot of work to pull it out the other side and redefine beer as a beverage that is rich in history, taste, variety and culture. As of now, people just don’t get it.

So - should we rename beer and start from scratch? I don’t know what we’d rename it, but sometimes I feel like we should. It’s amazing how heavy of a word “beer” is, and the amount of negative connotation attached to it. “What will you have with your steak dinner, Sir, a bottle of our finest Cabernet?” “Nope, bring me your beer list” “Oh. Right”.

What is it going to take to change this perception? Currently, many people are working hard to help beer out and give it a makeover. The craft brewers in this country and around the world are at the forefront, paving new ground and expanding the portfolio of beer worldwide. Beer writers and educators are gaining steam and wedging their (our) way into mainstream media. The cult following of craft beer is slowly peaking its head above the surface and making small waves in communities across the world. All are working hard to redefine what people think of when they hear the word “beer”. But is it going to work?

Jay Brooks has a great blog post that profiles an article written likening craft beer to wine, going as far as to call craft beers “winey beers”. Why does wine have to be the standard to which we hold beer? As long as that is in place, we’ll be fighting with the wine folks over the rightful place at the table. It simply exemplifies the notion that beer, as a concept, simply doesn’t command the respect that other beverages do, and disassociating that perception from the name is going to be one hell of a battle.

As I said, I have no idea what we’d call it. Honestly, I don’t want to rename it, but will we ever be able to change the reaction to it? Will beer one day fade away as the frat boy drink of choice and find its place at four star tables across the globe? Hopefully so - we’ve just got to keep talking about it.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!