Think twice before asking, AB

Posted on September 30th, 2007 in Random Thoughts by Justin

“Think about the best beer you’ve ever had…now, get ready to top it”

This was the opening line of the Budweiser commercial that I just saw while watching some football this afternoon.

Are they really wanting this challenge?

Way to spend more of that oversized marketing budget guys…

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Stone 11th Anniversary Ale

Posted on September 27th, 2007 in Tasting Notes by Justin

Stone 11th BottleHops hops hops. That describes this beer, and rightly so. The same brewers of the famous Ruination IPA and Arrogant Bastard have done it again this year with their 11th Anniversary ale. Self-titled as a “Black IPA” (or, IBA), this beer has a sweet nose loaded with citrusy, grapefruit hops that reek of West Coast. The beer sits in a snifter with a thin white head and a dark brown body. The nice medium thick mouthfeel supports a huge load of the same hops that are on the nose, with a sweet carriage underneath to pull the hops through the mouth. Starting slightly candylike on the front, the hop character fades to a heavy and widespread bitterness across the back of the mouth, lingering into a long bitter finish. Some faded dark fruit notes are present as well, but play second fiddle to the hops. Some resiny characteristics also run through the middle of the beer and tend to show up around mid-glass.

Overall, this is a pretty nice beer. Not terribly complex, but a solid beer that I’d classify as a super hopped up IPA (not quite into IIPA world, to my palate). At 8.7% abv and god-knows-how-many IBUs, this beer is surprisingly drinkable. Refreshing, in fact. But then, I love hops, so to others it could be off putting.

Generally, I’d recommend it. It’s not a far departure from their Arrogant Bastard archetype (although, I’ve not had AB in awhile), but still solid. Get yourself a bottle and give it a go.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Choosing the next Sam Adams seasonal

Posted on September 26th, 2007 in Random Thoughts, Tasting Notes by Justin

Last night, we attended a Sam Adams tasting and voting event here in Nashville.  Pretty cool stuff.  I was all prepped to do some live blogging from the event, but I don’t have my new phone, nor the blog set up for it yet…coming soon tho, live blogging!

Overall, the event was a bunch of fun.  I was duly impressed with the rep from Sam Adams, and his ability to explain beer correctly to the audience.  Too often, people leading beer tastings (many time someone who just works at the distributor) don’t know anything about beer.  This guy knew his stuff.

We were able to sample the Boston Lager, Sam Adams Light, Honey Porter, Octoberfest (sic), and Brown Ale.  The Boston Lager was served to us in the new Sam Adams glass (albeit, only about 1/3 full, so the true wonder of the glass was stifled).  We’ve tried the new glass before, and I’ve got to say - we’re pretty impressed.  Awhile back (about a year ago), we did a tasting comparing the Sam Adams glass with a standard pint glass.  The Sam Adams glass was much better, especially in the aroma department.  We were able to keep the glasses that we used during the event, so it’s nice to have a couple on board now at the house.

The other beers were as expected, and were typical for Sam Adams.  However, the cool part was when we were able to vote on the next seasonal.

Two beers are up for the spot:  an Irish Red and a Dunkelweizen.  I was enamoured with the idea of Sam doing a Dunkelweizen, so I was probably biased toward that particular beer, but nonetheless, we gave both an equal shake.

Both beers looked beautiful.  Aroma on both was fairly weak, with the Dunkel having a slightly better presence in this area with notes of banana, phenols, and light spiciness.  The body on both of the beers was average, with the Dunkel again coming out slightly ahead. 

Taste was where the rubber met the road.  The Irish Red tasted thin with very little malt depth and complexity and that signature Sam Adams bittering profile.  I thought the hop choice was a bit strange.  The Dunkel had a better profile, with the same notes as the nose plus a nice fruity background and a lingering fruity finish.

Overall, the Dunkel was clearly the winner.  That said, however, the Irish Red is currently winning the contest, which is unfortunate.  The group in attendance last night overwhelmingly chose the Dunkel, however, we seem to be at odds with the rest of the country. 

We’ll see which wins.  Natually, I hope the Dunkel does, but whatever.  Still, it’s a pretty cool way to get the consumers involved, and not a bad marketing plan either.  No doubt, there will be quite a bit of this seasonal bought when it finally turns up in stores.

The night was fun.  We met some cool folks, drank some good beer, and had a great time.  I won a Sam Adams hat, while Mollie was able to snag a set of 4 acyrllic pint glasses (not sure why they’re plastic, but they’re good for the pool or something of that sort).  If this contest happens to swing through your city, make sure to check it out.

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

SMS Post

Posted on September 25th, 2007 in Uncategorized by Justin

Test sms message

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Men’s Journal Top 25 beers

Posted on September 21st, 2007 in Beer News by Justin

Yet another list of great beers.  The October issue of Men’s Journal is listing the top 25 beers of the world in five distinct styles:  Pale Ales, Stouts, Belgians, Wheat Beers and Lagers/Pilsners.  Despite the fact that I find these categories somewhat arbitrary, the list isn’t all that bad. 

Check it out, and see what you think.

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Boscos Brewery - Nashville, TN

Posted on September 19th, 2007 in Our Podcast - Davis On Draft by Justin

Sorry (again) for the lack of posts. It’s been a busy week and as long as I have a regular day job on top of the beer writing gig…it’s a tight fit.

That said, I wanted to point out our episode of Davis on Draft this week. We traveled up to Nashville (just about 10 miles, but hey) and sat at Boscos brewery to do this week’s show. We interviewed Fred Scheer, head brewer up there, and talked about his beer, the craft beer industry, microbreweries, beer news, and much much more. Definitely check it out!

Here are some photos from the show. In the photos with all three of us, Fred is on the far left, I’m in the middle and Mollie (my wife and co-host) is on the far right. Enjoy, and listen to the show while you check out the pics!

Davis on Draft - Live at Boscos

Davis on Draft - Live at Boscos

Fred Scheer - Boscos

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

I didn’t have anything to do with this, I promise

Posted on September 12th, 2007 in Beer News by Justin

This afternoon in Nashville, a tractor-trailer carrying cases of Bud Light overturned on I-65.  Local residents are complaining that this could jeopardize the quality of their water supplies and pose threats to local wildlife.  In a related story, sales of straws were up 400% in local convenience stores following the accident.

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Clientele at tastings - does it make sense?

Posted on September 12th, 2007 in Random Thoughts, Rants by Justin

I feel like this blog is becoming one giant rant.  Sorry about that.  I’ll try to curb my future tirades and present more information here that is actually useful…not simply me spouting off :)

But, until that time, here’s another interesting discussion I’d like to begin, and would really love some input from others out there in the beer community.

I’ve noticed an interesting trend in tastings (be it beer, wine, liquor, whatever) - they attract the wrong crowd. 

Well, at least, sometimes.

Case in point:  Last night, we attended a tasting at a local beer/cigar shop here in Nashville.  Aside from the fact that there was zero glassware (see the previous rant on this blog), I was excited to try some new beer, learn about the brewery, and engage in beer conversation with like-minded individuals.

I realized, about halfway through the tasting, that the conversation I was interested in wasn’t really going to happen.  Why?  Wrong crowd.  Completely.

I’ve noticed this at other events.  For example, earlier this summer, Nashville played host to a very large beer tasting event called the Music City Brewer’s Festival.  We were lucky enough to have a booth at the event and represent the craft beer industry and our charge to educate more people about craft beer.  I noticed, however, that the vast majority of the people in attendance didn’t care about learning about or tasting craft beer - they simply wanted to get drunk.

Now, I realize that drinking large amounts of alcohol could potentially hamper your ability to think logically…but come on…this doesn’t make any sense at all.

Let’s look at the logic.  If someone’s goal is simply to drink as much as possible in order to get drunk, then they’re firstly not interested in taste.  For them, it’s alcohol delivery that is key.  So, to be as efficient as possible, they ought to either drink liquor or drink cheap mass market beer.  Remember, for the vast majority of these folks, getting drunk for cheap represents the epitome of the mission. 

So, this is where the math starts to break down.  The average 12-pack of swill costs somewhere in the neighborhood of $10-$12.  This provides the user with 12 cans of easily drinkable (I realize that this characterization is a sliding scale, but go with me here) alcohol water in 12 oz doses.  Generally speaking, the drinker (depending on their level of “experience”) will achieve their goal before finishing this 12-pack of beer, giving them an estimated drunk/dollar ratio of 1 dU (drunk unit) to approx. $10.

Why then, do these people choose to attend a festival with tickets that start at $30 and result in the same output of 1 dU?  The cost analysis here is mind-boggling.

Seriously though, I don’t understand it.  How does one organize a tasting and attract the correct clientèle?  Attracting the wrong crowd can undoubtedly ruin the experience for those interested in pursuing an educational opportunity.  One thought is to simply price the event out of reach of those simply interested in drinking, not tasting.  However, this seems to unfairly punish those who are interested in tasting by putting the burden on them.  Smart marketing could achieve the goal, but how clever would you need to be?

Has anyone had a good experience in setting up tastings at reasonable prices while attracting the correct group of customers?  Or are we simply relegated to always having to deal with the drunks?  Should we start setting up events called “drinkings” instead of “tastings” and see if the public starts to discern the difference?

I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences on this.  I don’t want to come off as a “tasting snob”.  Certainly there are times where I simply just drink beer.  But I want to preserve the opportunities for tasting beer as well.

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

State laws and glassware

Posted on September 11th, 2007 in Random Thoughts, Rants by Justin

Thanks Tennessee. Way to ruin an otherwise great beer tasting event.

Mollie and I attended a tasting tonight, hosted by a distributor here in Nashville, that was spotlighting Appalachian Beer Company. We arrived early at the beer store hosting the tasting, and decided to grab a beer while we waited. We grabbed a couple beers (mine was the Harviestoun Brewery Old Engine Oil and hers the Chocolate Stout by Fort Collins Brewery), paid for them, and proceeded to the lounge to grab a seat and enjoy our apertif before the tasting. We walked up and stopped at the spot where we normally grab a glass and pour the beer.

No glasses. Anywhere.

A quick inquiry to one of the employees revealed the truth: the health department had come by earlier and demanded they stop serving beer in glasses until they purchase a separate license. No pouring a beer from a bottle to a glass. Customer can’t pour their own; customer can’t bring their own serving vessel. Nothing. No glassware. Period. (In fact, this goes for not just glassware, but plastic, etc… ANY container whatsoever.)

Dismayed, I pressed further for an explanation. Evidently, according to the state law, beer cannot be transferred from one vessel (a bottle) to another (a glass) without proper licensing. Sure, you can serve it to patrons in a bottle, but god forbid you put it in a glass.

Say it with me….”What?!”

Yeah. Ridiculous. As I continued through the tasting, drinking beer from a bottle like a college frat kid, the gravity of the situation stewed on me. What kind of logic dictates this type of law?

I’ll answer that…none.

This, to me, is about nothing but money. Money to fill the state coffers by taxing alcohol in a backhanded and unfounded manner. Enter the neo-prohibitionists.

I’ll blog more about the tasting later, but I don’t feel like I can give an accurate review of the beer, as I was relegated to drinking out of a 1″ glass hole. I don’t blame the shop necessarily, as they are working hard to get the proper permits in place so that they will have glassware for their next tasting (a Sam Adams tasting in two weeks). I applaud them for the quick action to correct this problem.

What really irks me is the gall of the state lawmakers to craft laws that have absolutely zero basis in logic, but then, I suppose that’s the mantra of most government workings.

I realize this is a pretty scattered rant, but it’s getting late and I haven’t had much time to put this together in my head in a nice organized manner. Suffice to say, it bothered me enough that I wanted to write something tonight in order to assure I sleep a bit better.

Here’s what I want from you, the reader of this blog (all 2 of you): Tell me, under what line of logic can you base a law that requires a special permit in order to transfer beer from a bottle to a glass? Are we honestly that caught up in legislative red tape that our beer stores can’t even serve a beer correctly? This is where politics starts to really affect beer, and we’ve got to make sure it doesn’t get any more ridiculous than this.

So, tell me… how does this law make sense? I’m eager to read the responses.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!

Pricey beer still sitting on the shelf

Posted on September 11th, 2007 in Beer News by Justin

Turns out things are too good to be true.  Such is the case with Dan Woodul, the 25 year old who auctioned off a bottle of beer on eBay for over a half a million dollars.

Last month, Woodul listed the bottle, an 1852 vintage of Allsopp’s Artic Ale, on eBay and let the requests start piling in.  He had originally bought the bottle on eBay for only $304 (only $304?!).  Upon listing it on eBay, he quick accrued what would have amounted to a world record for the most expensive bottle of beer with the auction ending at $503,300.

However, it turns out the bid wasn’t legit.

Woodul says the bidder called the night that the auction ended to let him know that it was a joke bid and wouldn’t cough up the sum of money.  He says he has no hard feelings toward the bidder, and has now placed the bottle into a safety deposit box with no plans to sell it or re-list it on eBay. 

Read the full story

What would you do with a 155 year old bottle of beer?

Powered by ScribeFire.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to get automatic updates of new posts!